Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Horsky

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

.Appeal from District Court, Pierce county; Goss, J. Action by C. B. Hughes and others against Joseph Horsky and others, as Commisisoners of Pierce county, and Pierce county. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

This is an appeal, from a judgmnet against the plaintiffs and appellants, denying their demand that the county commissioners of Pierce county be restrained from issuing and negotiating certain bonds voted to be issued by said county at the November, 1908, general election, for the purpose of building a courthouse and jail in Pierce county. The first contention of appellants is that there was no sufficient notice given of the election held for the purpose of voting for or against the issuance of bonds for such purpose. Section 2565 of the Revised Codes of 1905, providing for elections on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stern v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blaine v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Reid v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Dickinson v. Board of CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Daly v. BeeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API