Aktienggesellschaft v. Kirk
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
1Per curiam
Relators Hoescht Aktienggesellschaft (AG), a German Corporation, and Hoescht Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, seek writs of mandamus directing the trial court to vacate its May 17,1993, order overruling their special appearances and to enter an order granting their special appearances. See TEX.R.CIV.P. 120a. The controlling issue is whether mandamus is the proper remedy in these cases. We hold that rela-tors have an adequate remedy by appeal and, therefore, that mandamus is not appropriate in these cases.
Relators, along with six other defendants, have been sued by more than 100 plaintiffs…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Abor v. BlackTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Pope v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Street v. Second Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. WittigTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- CSR LTD. v. LinkTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- CSR LTD. v. LinkTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. WittigTexas Supreme Court · 1994