Legal Opinion

Kunde v. Teesdale Lumber Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1974No. Docket 16178, 16179PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolbrook, J.

On January 6, 1969, plaintiff was struck in the right eye by an object while he was cutting through rough lumber with a power saw in the defendant Teesdale Lumber Company’s sawmill. In 1926 plaintiff had lost practically all the vision of his left eye as a result of an automobile accident. Owing to the work-related injury in January 1969, plaintiff lost approximately 85% of the visual capacity of his right eye. Plaintiff has, however, been fitted with a contact lens in the right eye and with it the loss of vision is only 35%. According to plaintiff’s treating physician, the contact lens has…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Richardson v. BelcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Fox v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Cline v. Studebaker Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Hutsko v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Verberg v. Simplicity Pattern Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hakala v. Burroughs Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Randall v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Hakala v. Burroughs Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hakala v. Burroughs Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Hakala v. Burroughs Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API