Legal Opinion
Neulist v. County of Nassau
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
James F. Niehoff, J.
This is a common-law action for malicious prosecution in which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages in the sum of $10,300,000. The action arises out of the prosecution of the plaintiff, Robert S. Neulist, for the alleged murder of his wife on May 12, 1971. Before the court is (1) a motion by the defendants County of Nassau, Matthew Bonora, John Wichmann, Andrew Mulraine, Thomas F. Heffernan, Fred Catapano and James J. Mahoney for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) a cross motion by the plaintiff for an order limiting the defendants’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Martin v. City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Zarcone v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- McKinney v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Greene v. Town of Blooming GroveCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Greene v. Town of Blooming GroveCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- SCOPE IND. v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & FlomDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1983
- Neulist v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Sparrow Fund Management LP v. Mimedx Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021