Legal Opinion
Save Our Heritage Organisation v. City of San Diego
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided October 24, 2018No. D073064PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcconnell, P. J.
*660I
INTRODUCTION
Save Our Heritage Organisation (SOHO) appeals from a judgment denying its petition for writ of mandamus challenging the approval by the City of San Diego (City) of an environmental impact report (EIR) addendum for revisions to the Plaza de Panama project (project) at Balboa Park. SOHO contends we must reverse the judgment because the City's approval of the addendum violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq. )1 in two respects. First, SOHO contends CEQA Guidelines section 15164 (Guideline 15164),2 which authorizes the addendum…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Muzzy Ranch Co. v. Solano County Airport Land Use CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Save Tara v. City of West HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Communities for a Better Environment v. California Resources AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Cal. Dep't of Conservation, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Center for Biological Diversity v. CA Dept. of ConservationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- San Diego Navy Broadway Complex Coalition v. Cal. Coastal Com.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Save Our Access v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- V Lions Farming, LLC v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024