State v. McDaniel
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McCRODDEN, Judge.
Defendants present four arguments for review by this Court. Because one of these arguments compels us to reverse the judgment of the trial court, we need not address the other three. The argument in which we find merit is defendants’ contention that there was insufficient evidence that they acted in an unlawful or criminally negligent manner, alternative elements of involuntary manslaughter, and that the trial court, therefore, erred in denying their motions to dismiss the charges.
At trial the State’s evidence tended to show that on 16 July 1988, Mark Hibbard was driving…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. LinebergerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- United States v. Rodney VinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Rodney VinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015