Legal Opinion

Tipton v. Jansson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1967No. 9951PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Justice.

This is an appeal from an Industrial Accident Board order denying a claim for workmen’s compensation for the death of appellant’s husband.

Death was caused by a rupture of an aneurysm on an artery in the brain. The rupture apparently happened during decedent’s working hours.

The Board found appellant did not prove an industrial accident had caused the rupture. To the contrary, the Board determined, the evidence shows “almost a medical certainty and in any event a medical probability” that a “congenital abnormality,” weakening of the artery, made the rupture “inevitable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Department of Law EnforcementIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Dawson v. HartwickIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Bennett v. Bunker Hill CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Darvell v. Wardner Industrial UnionIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Hammond v. Kootenai CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Madron v. Green Giant CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Kern v. SharkIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Fife v. Home Depot, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Green v. Columbia Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Gomez v. DURA MARK, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API