Legal Opinion
Borghi v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 8, 1955No. Civ. 16691PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
The question here is the priority between an annexation proceeding and an incorporation proceeding covering portions of the same territory. It is raised by a petition for writ of mandate in which “the Executive Committee of the Steering Committee for the incorporation of Union City” as a city of the sixth class, seeks an order compelling the Board of Supervisors of Alameda County to proceed on the petition filed with it for the incorporation of said Union City. The city of Hayward and its governing body, which were proceeding with the annexation of certain areas included within the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Forde v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Johnson v. City of San PabloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- People Ex Rel. City of Pasadena v. City of Monterey ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Town of Greenfield v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- People ex rel. Boardman v. Town of LindenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hubbell v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- City of West Fargo v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- People Ex Rel. City of Torrance v. City of GardenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- City of Costa Mesa v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Amrep Southwest, Inc. v. Town of BernalilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.