Legal Opinion

State v. David Burris

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 2018No. 2017-0409PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLynn, C.J.

The defendant, David Burris, has been indicted on three counts of felony reckless conduct. See RSA 631:3 (2016). The Superior *832 Court ( Delker , J.) denied the defendant's motion to dismiss the charges but approved this interlocutory appeal from ruling. Sup. Ct. R. 8. Because we conclude that the defendant is not entitled to transactional immunity under Part I, Article 15 of the New Hampshire Constitution, we affirm and remand.

The facts as presented in the interlocutory appeal statement are as follows. At the time of the events giving rise to the indictment, the defendant was employed as a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re C.O. In re G.L.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API