Legal Opinion

Mariani v. United States

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1999No. 3:CV-98-1701PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

VANASKIE, Chief Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This action under 2 U.S.C. § 437h challenges the constitutionality of provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act (“FECA” or “Act”), 2 U.S.C. §§ 431, et seq., which ban corporate contributions to candidates for federal elective office, 2 U.S.C. § 441b (the “corporate contribution ban”), and prohibit making campaign contributions in the name of another person, 2 U.S.C. § 441f (the “conduit contribution ban”). Section 437h of Title 2 U.S.C. assigns to the en banc court of appeals the role of decision maker on constitutional challenges to FECA…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Federal Election Commission v. National Conservative Political Action CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. ADT, LLC v. Capital Connect, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2015
  2. Renato P. Mariani v. United States of America, Federal Election Commission (Intervenor in d.c.)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. Citibank, N.A. v. Affinity Processing Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  4. Cao v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2010
  5. National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API