Legal Opinion
Modica v. Merin
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 27, 1991No. C010107PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
Plaintiff Cynthia Módica purports to appeal from a summary judgment entered in this action for legal malpractice in favor of defendant Mark E. Merin.
The record on appeal reflects that on June 14, 1990, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Thereafter, defendant prepared and the court signed a formal order granting the motion. Plaintiff appealed, but on September 27, 1990, plaintiff’s appeal was dismissed as from a nonappealable order granting summary judgment.
On November 5,1990, plaintiff filed in the trial court and served a “notice of entry of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Otworth v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- California State Employees'assn. v. St. of Calif.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Donohue v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Carroll v. Hanover Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Cohen v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Powell v. KleinmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Hill v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Smith v. Hopland Band of Pomo IndiansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Francis v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Stockinger v. Feather River Community CollegeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.