Sharpe v. . Eliason
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Aotxon by plaintiffs against W. A. Eliason assignee of •L. Pinkus, for an accounting to ascertain tbe amount with which defendant is chargeable as assignee and for his removal and the appointment of a receiver. From a judgment confirming the report of a referee the plaintiffs appealed. The facts necessary to an understanding of the decision appears in the opinion of Chief Justice Eaieolotii.
1Opinion of the Court
EaiRoloth, C. J.:
This case was heard on referee’s report and one fact found was as follows: “That the blackberries sold Wallace Bros, were part of the effects belonging to the assignment, or became such, and are duly accounted for by the said Eliason as assignee.” The plaintiffs except, and say “That said report is vague and uncertain, in that it does not state the amount of money realized for berries sold Wallace Bros, and does not state how the same was accounted for.” The other two findings of fact and exceptions thereto present the same question. His Honor overruled these exceptions and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McCampbell v. McClungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
3Cited by1 opinion
- Greer v. AndrewSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909