Legal Opinion

Franco v. Arakelian Enterprises, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 2015No. B232583APublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHANEY, J.

Our Supreme Court has transferred this matter to us with directions to vacate our decision filed November 26, 2012, and to reconsider the cause in light of Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348 [173 Cal.Rptr.3d 289, 327 P.3d 129] (Iskanian).

Following the rule announced in Iskanian, we reverse and remand with directions the trial court’s order denying the petition of defendant Arakelian Enterprises, Inc. (Arakelian), to compel arbitration of plaintiff’s claims for individual and class action relief, and for representative relief under the Labor…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Huff v. Securitas Sec. Servs. United States, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Tanguilig v. Bloomingdale's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Levin v. Caviar, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Saheli v. White Mem'l Med. Ctr., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API