Parodi v. Washoe Medical Center, Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellants contend that improvident conduct by the district judge during voir dire minified the seriousness of their wrongful death action and engendered an inappropriate trial atmosphere that prejudiced their right to a fair trial. Appellants also challenge the giving of two jury instructions, which, when read together, constitute an error-in-judgment instruction. For the reasons discussed below, we reverse the judgment entered by the district court and remand the matter for a new trial.
FACTS
In abbreviated part, the facts indicate that Shirley Swisher, then fifty-four years of age,…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Starr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Ginnis v. Mapes Hotel CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Wall v. StoutSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by44 opinions
- Lioce v. CohenNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Papke v. HarbertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Morlino v. MEDICAL CENTER OF OCEAN CTY.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Rudin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Pleasants v. Alliance Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.