Legal Opinion
Nathan Barr v. Autozoners, LLC; Autozone, Inc.; Dwayne Johnson; and Does 1 to 100, inclusive
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 2, 2026No. 2:23-cv-02319Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 NATHAN BARR, No. 2:23-cv-02319 WBS AC 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: 15 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR AUTOZONERS, LLC; AUTOZONE, SUMMARY JUDGMENT 16 INC.; DWAYNE JOHNSON, and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 ----oo0oo---- 21 Plaintiff Nathan Barr brought this employment 22 discrimination action under California’s Fair Employment & 23 Housing Act,
Cal. Gov. Code § 12940, et seq. (“FEHA”), against 24 defendants Autozoners, LLC and AutoZone, Inc. (together, 25 “Autozone”);…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Raymond Vincent Nidds v. Schindler Elevator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.