Legal Opinion

H. E. Wright & Co. v. Douglas

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1919No. 961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the District Court, Weston County; Hon. Ernest C. Raymond, Judge. Action hy R. S- Douglas against H. E. Wright & Co. to enjoin the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage by notice and sale. From a judgment granting a perpetual injunction, the defendant brings error.

Read the full summary

Error to the District Court, Weston County; Hon. Ernest C. Raymond, Judge. Action hy R. S- Douglas against H. E. Wright & Co. to enjoin the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage by notice and sale. From a judgment granting a perpetual injunction, the defendant brings error. The Court erred in denying defendant’s motion for judgment -on the pleadings; the statute (4401 C. S.) provides that allegations of new matter in the answer not controverted by a reply shall be taken as true; the answer alleged an insufficiency of tender, and no reply was filed; there was no tender of gold coin, nor was there…

1Opinion of the Court

Beard, Ci-iiee Justice.

This is an action brought by the defendant in error, Robert S. Douglas, against the plaintiff, in error, PI. E. Wright & Company, to enjoin the foreclosure by notice and sale of a certain chattel mortgage given by Douglas to one Frank W. Keeler. A temporary injunction was issued, and on final hearing was made perpetual. Wright & Company bring error.

*308Douglas alleged in his petition, in substance:

1. That on July 10, 1917, he executed and delivered to Frank W. Keeler, his two promissory notes, one for $5,-000.00, and one for $4,259.18, each due six months after date, with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schaeffer v. ColdrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Graves v. BurchWyoming Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Larsen Sheep Co. v. SjogrenWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Parkinson v. RobertsWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Burns v. Corn Exch. Nat. Bank of OmahaWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Fisk Rubber Co. of New York v. Lawer Auto SupplyWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  5. J BAR H, INC. v. MartinWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API