Legal Opinion

Winchester v. Hoover

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Jackson: Hiero K. Hanna, Judge. Suit by Winchester & Main against tbe widow and children of George W. Hoover to determine ah adverse interest in realty, and the principal question is the meaning of the will left by deceased. Plaintiffs had a decree from which defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

1. This is a suit to determine conflicting or adverse claims to real property. The facts are that on October 12,1886, George W. Hoover died in Douglas County, leaving a will, in which, after giving to his children and grandchildren $1 each, he devised and bequeathed “all the balance, remainder, and residue of my estate, including both real and personal property, which I .may own at the time of my death, and not herein otherwise disposed of, to my wife, Huldah E. Hoover, to have and hold during her life, or while she shall remain unmarried, to pay my debts, to support herself, and to maintain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith T. v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Brant v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Boyd v. StrahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Wetter v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  5. Kennedy v. KennedyIllinois Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Savage v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Gildersleeve v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Pacific Coal & Transportation Co. v. Pioneer Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  4. Bussone v. MarshOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Bough v. KingDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API