Legal Opinion

Pekin Insurance Company v. Marsha Hinton

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 2016No. 2014-IA-01820-SCTPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAXWELL, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. In this interlocutory appeal, .Pekin Insurance Company challenges the Jones County Circuit Court’s denial of its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Pekin — an Illinois company not licensed to sell insurance in Mississippi — asserts it had not entered a contract with a Mississippi resident, had not committed a tort in Mississippi, and had not done any business in Mississippi. So it cannot be subject to the jurisdiction of Mississippi courts under our long-arm statute. 1

¶ 2, But Pekin voluntarily submitted itself to the jurisdiction of a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. McFadin v. GerberCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. PaineWebber Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Private Bank (Switzerland)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marsha R. Hinton v. Pekin Insurance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Patrick Ridgeway v. Louise Ridgeway HookerMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  3. The Door Shop, Inc. v. Alcorn County Electric Power AssociationMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  4. L.C. Slaughter and Isiac Jackson v. City of Canton, Mississippi and Board of AldermenMississippi Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Lacunya Hodges, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated v. Administrative Systems, Inc., et al.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API