Pekin Insurance Company v. Marsha Hinton
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MAXWELL, Justice,
for the Court:
¶ 1. In this interlocutory appeal, .Pekin Insurance Company challenges the Jones County Circuit Court’s denial of its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Pekin — an Illinois company not licensed to sell insurance in Mississippi — asserts it had not entered a contract with a Mississippi resident, had not committed a tort in Mississippi, and had not done any business in Mississippi. So it cannot be subject to the jurisdiction of Mississippi courts under our long-arm statute. 1
¶ 2, But Pekin voluntarily submitted itself to the jurisdiction of a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McFadin v. GerberCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- PaineWebber Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Private Bank (Switzerland)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marsha R. Hinton v. Pekin Insurance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
- Patrick Ridgeway v. Louise Ridgeway HookerMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
- The Door Shop, Inc. v. Alcorn County Electric Power AssociationMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
- L.C. Slaughter and Isiac Jackson v. City of Canton, Mississippi and Board of AldermenMississippi Supreme Court · 2024
- Lacunya Hodges, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated v. Administrative Systems, Inc., et al.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.