Interstate Commerce Commission v. Inland Waterways Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson
By schedules filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission to become effective October 15, 1939, the appellant eastern railroads1 sought to deny grain arriving at Chicago by barge over the Illinois Waterways the privilege of moving out of Chicago by rail on “proportional” rates applicable to competing grain arriving at Chicago by lake steamer or rail. The only other rates on which the ex-barge grain could move eastward by rail from Chicago were “local” rates, which were in all cases higher than the existing “proportional” rates. The proposed schedules were protested by barge lines and others…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Board of Trade of Kansas City v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Cargill, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1942
3Cited by59 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- ICC v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. MechlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.