Legal Opinion

Rivas v. Board of Cosmetologists

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1984No. 15288PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FEDERICI, Chief Justice.

Petitioners Petra B. Rivas and Jo Etta New brought this action in the District Court of Dona Ana County appealing the decision of the respondent Board of Cosmetologists (Board) denying New’s application for a license to practice cosmetology and suspending Rivas’ ownership license. The district court reversed. The Board appeals. We affirm.

The issue on appeal is whether the Board, in repealing one of its regulations, failed to follow correct statutory procedure, thereby both nullifying the repeal of the regulation and denying both New and Rivas due process.

Rulemaki…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Mobil Oil Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. The Bell Telephone Company Of Pennsylvania v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  5. State Ex Rel. State Park & Recreation Commission v. New Mexico State AuthorityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Clark v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  2. New Mexico Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Lujan Grisham v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2021
  4. AA Oilfield Service, Inc. v. New Mexico State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Public Service Co. v. New Mexico Public Service CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API