Legal Opinion

Rezac Livestock Commission Co., Inc. v. Pinnacle Bank

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided December 23, 2019No. 5:15-cv-04958Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS REZAC LIVESTOCK COMMISSION CO., INC., Plaintiff, Case No. 15-4958-DDC v. PINNACLE BANK, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Rezac Livestock Commission Co., Inc., asserts claims against defendants Dinsdale Bros., Inc., (“Dinsdale”) and Pinnacle Bank (“Pinnacle”) arising from a cattle sale gone wrong. The alleged facts underlying plaintiff’s claims are briefly summarized as follows: Plaintiff sold cattle at an auction to Charles Leonard. Mr. Leonard wrote a check to plaintiff. Mr. Leonard sold those cattle to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Pittsburg, Inc. v. Pepsico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. Stoldt v. City of TorontoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Haz-Mat Response, Inc. v. Certified Waste Services Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API