Legal Opinion

Lederkremer v. Lederkremer

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCuff, J.

This action for an annulment was tried in Kings county. At the conclusion of the trial I dictated findings leaving open one question, to wit, the law of Poland with respect to grounds for annulling a marriage. That question has been briefed and an additional hearing had on that point. The court appreciates the untiring efforts of counsel.

Those findings were: Defendant’s representations that he loved plaintiff and that he wanted her for his wife when he proposed marriage to her in April, 1936, at Zamosc, Poland, were false; that at the time he knew that his representations were false; that he: *588…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union National Bank of Chicago v. ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Shonfeld v. ShonfeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Mitchell v. MitchellNew York Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Holzer v. GesellschaftNew York Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The United States of America v. Jose Diogo, Domingo Das Canas Costa and Manuel Vilanova GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. The United States of America v. Jose Diogo, Domingo Das Canas Costa and Manuel Vilanova GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API