Lederkremer v. Lederkremer
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCuff, J.
This action for an annulment was tried in Kings county. At the conclusion of the trial I dictated findings leaving open one question, to wit, the law of Poland with respect to grounds for annulling a marriage. That question has been briefed and an additional hearing had on that point. The court appreciates the untiring efforts of counsel.
Those findings were: Defendant’s representations that he loved plaintiff and that he wanted her for his wife when he proposed marriage to her in April, 1936, at Zamosc, Poland, were false; that at the time he knew that his representations were false; that he: *588…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Union National Bank of Chicago v. ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Shonfeld v. ShonfeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Mitchell v. MitchellNew York Supreme Court · 1909
- Holzer v. GesellschaftNew York Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by2 opinions
- The United States of America v. Jose Diogo, Domingo Das Canas Costa and Manuel Vilanova GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- The United States of America v. Jose Diogo, Domingo Das Canas Costa and Manuel Vilanova GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963