Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Mitchell

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1909PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Application, upon proof, for a decree annulling a marriage.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This is an application to annul the marriage heretofore entered into between the parties on the 3d day of May, 1908, on the ground that, at the time the marriage was contracted, the plaintiff had not reached the age of legal consent.

The evidence given before the court discloses that the plaintiff, at the time of her marriage to the defendant, was under the age of eighteen years. Both she and the defendant were, at the time, and ever since have been, residents and citizens of the city of Buffalo, in the State of New York. On the 3d day of May, 1908, the parties crossed the Miagara river and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Kinnier v. . KinnierNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Van Voorhis v. . BrintnallNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Livingston v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. du Pont v. du PontSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Davidson v. ReamNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Du Pont v. Du PontSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  4. Bays v. BaysNew York Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Cruickshank v. CruickshankNew York Supreme Court · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API