Ex Parte Hill
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
After a discussion of rulings on the introduction of evidence, the further announcement of the Oourt of Appeals that “the court did not err in any of its rulings” embraced the refusal of defendant’s charge 1. It is unnecessary to refer the same to the Court of Appeals for further treatment. Having ruled thereon, a case within Ex parte Cowart, 201 Ala. 55, 77 South. 349, is not presented.
Since there was no specific discussion of the charge, it should be said charges invoking like principles of law of circumstantial evidence have been considered.
The rulings of the Court of Appeals on the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ex parte AcreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Gilmore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Pickens v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- Compton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Ex Parte CowartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Skumro v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Tatum v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Kansas City Bridge Co. v. Alabama State Bridge Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- White v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1964
- Morgan v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.