Skumro v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
A phase of this -case, such as the corptís delicti, was passed upon in the recent decision of Berry v. State, 231 Ala. 437, 165 So. 97.
It is established by our decisions: (1) That, whether there was any evidence corroborating an accomplice as a witness and connecting the accused with the commission of the offense charged, is a question of law for the court; and- (2) that its force and effect, or sufficiency, when c:onsidered in connection with the testimony <jf that accomplice and all the other evidence, to establish the accused’s guilt of such crime, is a question for the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Doss v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Ex Parte GrimmettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Malachi v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Cumbo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Jacks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Sorrell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Pollard v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.