Legal Opinion

Skumro v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 19, 1936No. 2 Div. 91PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

A phase of this -case, such as the corptís delicti, was passed upon in the recent decision of Berry v. State, 231 Ala. 437, 165 So. 97.

It is established by our decisions: (1) That, whether there was any evidence corroborating an accomplice as a witness and connecting the accused with the commission of the offense charged, is a question of law for the court; and- (2) that its force and effect, or sufficiency, when c:onsidered in connection with the testimony <jf that accomplice and all the other evidence, to establish the accused’s guilt of such crime, is a question for the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Doss v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Ex Parte GrimmettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Malachi v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  5. Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Cumbo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. Jacks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  3. Sorrell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Pollard v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API