Legal Opinion

Ruby O. Walter v. Edna Zoe Warner

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 26, 1962No. 6789_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

This controversy between two sisters involves rival claims of ownership and right of possession to certain residential property in Kansas City, Kansas. Edna Zoe Warner and Ruby 0. Walter are sisters, and they were the only children and sole heirs of Joseph W. Moberly and Alice I. Moberly. Edna claimed under an oral contract with her parents, and Ruby claimed under a deed from her mother. Edna instituted the action against Ruby; and for convenience, reference will be made to them as plaintiff and defendant, respectively. Jurisdiction was predicated upon diversity of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Woltz v. First Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  3. Nash v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. James v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Marion Roberts and Nolah Roberts v. N. C. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  2. Brown v. McGraw-Edison Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  3. Brian K. Black v. Hieb's Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  4. In Re Estate of ShirkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  5. Richardson v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API