Legal Opinion

State v. Bergman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 3, 2010No. 08C40721; A139018PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for two counts of theft in the first degree, one for stealing property valued at more than $750, ORS ldd.OSSOXa), 1 and the other for selling that same property, ORS 164.055(l)(c). Citing State v. Turner, 211 Or App 96, 153 P3d 134 (2007), he argues that the trial court erred in failing to merge the two convictions because evidence that he stole and then sold the same property supports only one theft conviction. He acknowledges that he failed to preserve the argument that he now raises on appeal, but urges this court to exercise its discretion to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. Camacho-AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API