Legal Opinion

Taylor v. La Bar

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1874PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On final hearing on pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The only question presented by the pleadings in this case is, whether the building, for work on which the defendants, Edward D. La Bar & Co., carpenters, and Jonas E. Wuchter, roofer, claim mechanics’ liens, was commenced before the recording of the complainant’s mortgage. The mortgage is dated April 1st, 1872, and was recorded on the 4th of the same month. It was given by George A. La Bar and wife to William F, Van Deventer, (by whom it was subsequently *223assigned to the complainant,) to secure advances which Van Deventer then, by written contract, agreed to make in installments…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennock v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
  2. Wells v. Canton Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1852

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Micele v. FaldutiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API