Legal Opinion

Abrahim Fata v. Abigail Sheehan, et al.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 31, 2025No. 2:24-cv-11030Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ABRAHIM FATA, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:24-cv-11030 (BRM) (MAH) v. OPINION ABIGAIL SHEEHAN, et al., Defendants. MARTINOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Abrahim Fata’s (“Plaintiff”) fourth amended complaint (“Fourth Amended Complaint”), filed pursuant to

42 U.S.C. §§ 1983

and 1985 (ECF No. 9.)1 Also before the Court is Plaintiff’s applications to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF Nos. 11, 13) and motion to reopen his case (ECF No. 12). Having reviewed Plaintiff’s applications to proceed IFP,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API