Abrahim Fata v. Abigail Sheehan, et al.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ABRAHIM FATA, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:24-cv-11030 (BRM) (MAH) v. OPINION ABIGAIL SHEEHAN, et al., Defendants. MARTINOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Abrahim Fata’s (“Plaintiff”) fourth amended complaint (“Fourth Amended Complaint”), filed pursuant to
42 U.S.C. §§ 1983
and 1985 (ECF No. 9.)1 Also before the Court is Plaintiff’s applications to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF Nos. 11, 13) and motion to reopen his case (ECF No. 12). Having reviewed Plaintiff’s applications to proceed IFP,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.