Legal Opinion
Benihana of Tokyo, Inc. v. Benihana, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 22, 2014No. Civ. No. 10-1051-SLRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
On December 3, 2010, Benihana of Tokyo, Inc. (“plaintiff’ or “BOT”) filed this complaint comprising six causes of action: (1) breach of contract; (2) specific performance; (3) conversion; (4) false designation of origin; (5) trademark infringement; and (6) declaratory judgment. (D.I. 1 at 6-12) Plaintiff amended its complaint on December 7, 2010. (D.I. 6) On February 4, 2011, defendants Benihana, Inc. (“BI”) and Noodle Time, Inc. (“Noodle Time,” collectively “defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Camp Ne'er Too Late, LP v. Swepi, LPDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Benihana of Tokyo, Inc. v. Benihana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- The American Institute for Chartered Property Casualty Underwriters v. PotterDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022