Legal Opinion
Al-Janet, LLC v. B & B Home Improvements, LLC
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 19, 2007No. AC 27370PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The plaintiffs, Al-Janet, LLC, Ghulam Murtaza and Zahid Hussain, appeal from the judgment rendered after the jury’s verdict in favor of the defendants, Berube Insurance Agency and Gary P. Berube. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) declined to instruct the jury on the general duties of an insurance agent and the elements of promissory estoppel as proposed by the plaintiffs and (2) granted the defendants’ motion to preclude the testimony of an expert witness. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
This matter arises out of a contractual dispute…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Ursini v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Smith v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Prentice v. Dalco Electric, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sutcliffe v. FleetBoston Financial Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Costanzo v. GrayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Sophia v. City of DanburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Russo v. Phoenix Internal Medicine Associates, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Al-Janet, LLC v. B & B Home Improvements, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.