In Interest of RB
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtDean, J.
R.B., a minor, appeals from a judgment convicting him of possessing beer in violation of sec. 66.054(20) (b), Stats. R.B. argues that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he possessed beer. Be cause we conclude that a showing of R.B.’s mere presence at a beer party, even with knowledge of the alleged possession of beer by other minors, is not sufficient to convict R.B. of violating sec. 66.054(20) (b), we reverse.
R.B. admitted that he attended a beer party with his friends. He denied obtaining beer, drinking beer, or intending to drink beer. The trial court found that R.B. “was at the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Milwaukee v. WilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. DoddWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- In Matter of GrantWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Roe v. LarsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Roe v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. DuncanWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. DuncanWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. BradshawWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. HornadayWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Nick v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.