Legal Opinion

Kron v. Demorest

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 14, 2004No. 04-0270Published

1Opinion of the Court

Robert A. Kron and Nancy Kron Sievers, Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v.

Harry Demorest and Black Dog Properties, a Partnership, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 04-0270.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed: December 14, 2004.

Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J. and Peterson, J.

¶1 PER CURIAM.

Harry Demorest and Black Dog Properties (hereinafter, Demorest) appeal a judgment in this action arising out of a boundary dispute. Demorest argues that the trial court erroneously determined that the Nelson survey located an accurate boundary. Alternatively, he contends the trial court erroneously concluded Demorest…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. SabourinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Matter of Estate of DejmalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Burkhardt v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Allie v. RussoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Bloomer Housing Ltd. Partnership v. City of BloomerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API