Legal Opinion
Frank J. Nascone, and Spudnuts of Pennsylvania, Inc., a Corporation v. Spudnuts, Inc., a Corporation, and Frank Boyd
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 26, 1984No. 83-5602PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit'Judge.
Frank Nascone, a Pittsburgh-based franchisee of Spudnuts,.a Utah-based fast food franchisor, appeals from an order of the district court for the Western District of Pennsylvania transferring this diversity and antitrust action to the District of Utah because of a forum selection clause in a franchise agreement that the court found to be applicable to the case and reasonable in scope and content. Nascone advances a number of arguments that the district court erred on the merits in issuing the transfer order. The critical issue on this appeal, however,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Country Chrysler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Charles E. Abels and Irene C. Abels v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- In Re Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.