Legal Opinion

Neufeld v. Rodiminski

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 25, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. George Driggs, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtGary, J.

Below, this was an action by the appellee against appellant for a malicious prosecution.

On the real facts, without reference to the alleged advice of counsel, the malicious character of, and the entire want of probable cause for the prosecution, were abundantly proved. With no error of law in the case it would be impossible to disturb a verdict for the appellee.

The appellant was a dealer in goods that go into the making of picture frames, and the appellee was a maker of picture frames. The appellant supplied the appellee with such goods, nominally to be sold on commission, but in fact it is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Alley v. LimbertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Seeden v. KolarikAppellate Court of Illinois · 1953
  2. Dorgan v. GraeberAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  3. Brunk v. HuthmacherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API