Stone v. Richardson

Historically the facts are: Plaintiff appellee owned the north half of the northwest fractional quarter of Section 31, in Township 88, Range 24 west of the Fifth P. M., Hamilton County, while the south half of the same quarter section belonged to the defendant appellant.

Controversy arises over the east and west partition fence between the two properties. In 1904, ancient grantors of these parties then held title to the respective premises. Confusion arose concerning the proper place on which to build the “fence.” Consequently, a Mr. Iliff was employed to make the survey for the entire…