Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Penix

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 25, 1916No. 7625PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Pottawatomie County; Leander G. Pitman, Judge. Action by John Penix against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MATHEWS, C.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received by the plaintiff while employed as a laborer in defendant’s shops at Shawnee. The parties will be referred to as in the trial court. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $1,000, the motion for a new trial was overruled, and this appeal followed.

At the close of the testimony the defendant asked for a peremptory instruction, the same was refused, and is the first assignment of error presented here. The defendant based its demand for a peremptory instruction upon the fact that the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Neeley v. Southwestern Cotton Seed Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  2. Coalgate Co. v. HurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Dewey Portland Cement Co. v. BluntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Chickasaw Compress Co. v. BowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Choctaw Electric Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. WolfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Midland Valley Railroad v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. McAllister v. EalySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Oklahoma Petroleum & Gasoline Co. v. WinshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Murgatroyd v. DudleyWashington Supreme Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API