Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

City & County of Denver v. Board of Assessment Appeals

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 8, 1993No. 91SC775Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Lohr

I concur that provisions of article 1 of Colorado’s General Property Tax Act, §§ 39-1-101 to -121, 16B C.R.S. (1982 and 1992 Supp.), contemplate the application of a rule that taxes all the interests in taxable property no matter how they are divided. I further concur that the Board of Assessment Appeals (BOAA) may properly consider “actual” or “contract” rent payable under an existing lease when it determines the actual value of property for ad valo-rem tax purposes. I dissent, however, to the majority’s affirmance of the Colorado Court of Appeals’ judgment, because the BOAA order affirmed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Folsom v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Yadco, Inc. v. Yankton CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Board of Assessment Appeals of State v. E.E. Sonnenberg & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. Valencia Center, Inc. v. BystromSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. Folsom v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API