Legal Opinion · Dissent

Salas v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 10, 2007No. 26,385Published

1DissentVigil, Judge

{50} I dissent from the holding of the majority that when Plaintiff submitted the claim for payment of her medical bills to Mountain States, this automatically triggered an affirmative obligation upon Mountain States to provide her with notice of the terms of the underinsurance policy. Having breached this duty, the majority concludes, Mountain States is estopped from enforcing the consent-to-settle provision of the policy. This asserted duty has no basis in tort, contract, or public policy.

{51} Underinsurance coverage is purchased to insure against damages caused by a negligent motorist who…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ferrando v. Auto-Owners Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Mosley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Finstad v. Steiger Tractor, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Kippen v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Willey v. United Mercantile Life InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API