Legal Opinion

Dodds v. Kansas City

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 10, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTipton, J.

Pursuant to the provisions of Sections 3312 to 3317, R. S. Mo. 1939, the respondent filed a petition in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, for the purpose of procuring a pro forma decree adjudicating the validity of $1,000,000 of Kansas City Water Revenue Bonds, Series A. The appellant intervened in this action. The trial court entered a decree upholding the validity of these bonds. From that decree the appellant has duly appealed.

On July 1, 1922, Kansas City issued' $11,000,000 of water works bonds, Fourth Issue, which are general obligation bonds duly au thorized' by a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bell v. City of FayetteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  2. State Ex Rel. City of Hannibal v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. State ex rel. City of Columbia v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  4. Taylor v. DimmittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  5. State ex rel. City of Memphis v. HackmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Petition of Board of Public BuildingsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  2. City of Maryville v. CushmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Ballentine v. NesterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  4. City of Springfield v. MondaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  5. Mathison v. Public Water Supply District No. 2Supreme Court of Missouri · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API