Legal Opinion

Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Buer

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 22, 1951No. 11147PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff-appellee brought suit against defendant-appellant for infringement of Patent No. 2,371,472 issued March 13, 1945, to. Arthur George Ruff and appellee Buer for a cart. Ruff assigned his interest in the patent to appellee on October 21, 1947, and appellee brought suit on February 9, 1948.

After the issues had been made up and the trial had proceeded until the close of appellee’s evidence, appellant entered a motion to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds. The substance of the motion was that the court was without jurisdiction because the sale by appellant of a cart…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Munter v. Weil Corset Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Hug v. Lakewood Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
  5. Kelley-Koett Mfg. Co. v. McEuenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Evans v. RushingDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1959
  2. Allen v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  3. Acton MFG. Co., Inc. v. Louisville Tin & Stove Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API