Legal Opinion

United States v. Bielak

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided May 18, 1987No. Crim. HCR 85-23-01PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court following a hearing on the United States’ (“Government”) Petition to Vacate Plea Agreement and Reinstate Indictment held April 30 and May 1, 1987. At the hearing, the Government asserted that defendant Steven L. Bielak violated the terms of his plea agreement by failing to cooperate truthfully and candidly with investigators and/or failing to testify truthfully and candidly before a federal grand jury. After considering all the evidence and arguments offered at the hearing, the court finds that the Government’s petition should be…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. Peter A. Crusco and Phillip A. Cimmino. Appeal of Phillip CimminoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. BenchimolSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. Charles Armen Calabrese, Samuel Ray Calabrese, Charles R. KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. Kevin R. DaileyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. John T. Schilling and Robert J. SchillingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Amin AtayaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Epperson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. PackwoodDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
  5. United States v. FelicianoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API