Legal Opinion

People v. Gentry

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1969No. Crim. 4702PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment sentencing him to state prison after conviction by a jury of inflicting cruel or inhuman corporal punishment upon a child in violation of Penal Code section 273d.

Appellant Gentry’s contentions are several. None can be sustained. Principal among the arguable questions on this appeal is that the rule of People v. Johnson (1968) 68 Cal.2d 646 [68 Cal.Rptr. 599, 441 P.2d 111] 1 should be extended to exclude evidence which the trial court here admitted to establish a past recollection recorded. We hold Johnson is inapplicable. Other questions are considered under…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. EdelbacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. People v. RiccardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. People v. BynumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API