Legal Opinion

People v. Harris

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1934No. Calendar 37,697PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is habeas corpus, with ancillary writ of certiorari, to inquire into the legality of the confinement of defendant in the State prison at Jackson. Defendant contends:

1. That the court refused to appoint proper counsel for him.

The appointment of counsel is discretionary with the court and one who pleads guilty is not entitled to such appointment. People v. Williams, 225 Mich. 133.

2. That the crime was not established on the examination before the magistrate.

A plea of guilty is a waiver of examination (People v. Sanford, 233 Mich. 112), and, in any event, the point cannot be raised on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Edwards v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Bayliss v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. People v. UtterMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. In Re GardnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. In Re BrazelMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Recorder's Court Bar Ass'n v. Wayne Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. People v. TateMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API