Commonwealth v. Hannibal, S., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentChief Justice Saylor
I agree with Appellant’s position that errors and attorney derelictions occurred in connection with the admission of evidence, at his trial, of a triple murder for which Appellant was never charged or tried. Although the majority finds the relevant claim to have been previously litigated, see Majority Opinion at 374-75, 156 A.3d at 219-20, it is significant, from my point of view, that this Court has never addressed the main contention that Appellant sought to raise on direct appeal.1
At the direct appeal stage, Appellant presented a substantially developed argument that his trial counsel was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Dennis v. Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Kerry Neil EnjadyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. NewmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.