Legal Opinion

Leighton v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 29, 1933No. 735PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

In 1921 all assets of Leighton and Co., Inc., of California, were sold and the proceeds distributed pro rata among stockholders, including petitioners. Nothing remained ,to satisfy outstanding corporate obligations.

September, 1925, within the time permitted by statute, or written waivers, the Commissioner of Internal Reve nue notified the corporation of tax deficiencies for 1918, .1919, and 1920; and on January 16,1926, he assessed these against it. There was no contest. Efforts to enforce-payment by distraint were unsuccessful. The present equity suit seeks to compel petitioners severally to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. UpdikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. United States v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. United States v. Nashville, C. & St. L. RyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Scott v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  3. Thomas Wayne Joyce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. Vaughn C. Payne and Edith Pruitt Payne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  5. Phillips-Jones Corp. v. ParmleySupreme Court of the United States · 1937

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API