Legal Opinion
Spinks v. City of St. Louis Water Division
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided December 23, 1997No. 4:95-CV-2091 CASPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHAW, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant City of St. Louis Water Division’s (“Water Division”) motion to dismiss and defendant City of St. Louis’ (“City”) motion to strike. Plaintiff opposes the motions. For the reasons which follow, the Court will grant the motion to dismiss and permit plaintiff to file a third amended complaint, and will grant in part and deny in part the motion to strike.
Discussion.
1. Motion to Dismiss.
When ruling on a motion to dismiss, this Court must take the allegations of the complaint as true. Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morton v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Junior College District of St. Louis v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- Kopman v. City of CentervilleDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2012
- Cooksey v. Alliance BankDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- Grevlos v. Augustana UniversityDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023
- Ilsemann v. St. Charles County, MissouriDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.