Legal Opinion

Marks v. Goldstein

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 19, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNCAN, Justice.

This action seeks damages for personal injuries sustained by appellant when a power lawn mower which he was starting for appellee cut off the second and third toes of his left foot. Judgment, pursuant to a directed verdict, was entered for appellee in the lower court.

On April 29, 1952, appellant went to appellee’s home for the purpose of assisting in starting a power mower which appellee had purchased a short time previously. The mower had been purchased through appellant in order to enable appellee to secure it at wholesale price, but we do not regard that fact as of any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Porter v. CornettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  2. Poole v. Lutz & Schmidt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  3. Morrison & Conklin Const. Co. v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  4. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Co.'s Receiver v. Finnell's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  5. Jackson v. KreegerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kientz v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Carlisle v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
  3. Robertson v. LandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API