Legal Opinion

State v. Smith (In re Blaine)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2018No. 18-AP-142PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO'Connor, C.J.

*1207{¶ 1} Adam Arnold, counsel for the defendant, has filed an affidavit with the clerk of this court pursuant to R.C. 2701.03 seeking to disqualify Judge Erik Blaine from sentencing the defendant in the above-referenced case.

{¶ 2} Mr. Arnold claims that Judge Blaine has used the case "for political gain and publicity." Primarily, Mr. Arnold alleges that Judge Blaine scheduled sentencing on the day that Mr. Arnold will be returning from previously scheduled, out-of-state holiday travel, which will not allow him to adequately prepare for the sentencing. The judge's refusal to continue the hearing,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Goodwill Industries of Akron, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In re Disqualification of SolovanOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In re Disqualification of PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re C.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. Huber Hts. Veteran's Club, Inc. v. BowmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Colley v. CrabtreeOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API