Legal Opinion

In re Disqualification of Pontious

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 2001No. 2001-AP-078PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 1235.] IN RE DISQUALIFICATION OF PONTIOUS. THE STATE OF OHIO v. MCCULLOUGH. [Cite as In re Disqualification of Pontious,

2001-Ohio-4105.] Judges—Affidavit of disqualification—Judge’s receipt and consideration of unsolicited letters that relate solely to defendant’s request for a continuance are not evidence of bias or prejudice—General Assembly has required that judges consider the objections of crime victims to a request for continuance—R.C. 2930.08. (No. 01-AP-078—Decided September 14, 2001.) ON AFFIDAVIT OF…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. McCulloughOhio Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miklovic v. K. Dean Shira ConstructionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. Smith (In re Blaine)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. In re Disqualification of SusterOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In re Disqualification of MayberryOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. KaminskiOhio Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API